Does having grades help or hurt
students? (Because I heard of a school where going to class was
optional and for the first two weeks students didn't go to class.
After that they started going because they wanted to learn instead of
being forced. I'm not sure if it's real, though.)
I have been
curious about this for a long time, and I have taught classes that
gave grades and others that didn't, so I have seen it from both
sides.
Probably the most
prominent critic of grades currently is Alfie Kohn. You might be
interested in this
article, in which he summarizes his analysis of the effect of
grades on motivation. Kohn argues that giving grades makes students
less interested in what they're learning, draws them to look for the
easiest possible task, and reduces the value of their thinking.
Students who are focused on getting better grades eventually come to
see the grade and purpose of education, and they often lose a love of
learning. Students at schools where grades are heavily emphasized,
or who have parents who give them monetary rewards for grades, are
more likely to cheat.
Kohn has some good
insights and research to back up what he says, and I think that
grades will often have a detrimental effect on students who are
highly motivated to learn because of their own intrinsic curiosity.
On the other hand, there are students who have low intrinsic
motivation who will learn only if there is some extrinsic motivation.
Since a modern classroom has students of all types of motivation,
grades seem to be a necessary evil. Probably the best solution is to
give grades, but not to focus on them as the sole goal of education.
This is a hard balance to create, especially since parents have the
central role in creating expectations, and so the school's role is
limited. This
summary of research has a good bibliography if you want to read
further.
I used to teach
non-credit classes at community college. Most of the pupils in these
classes were senior citizens, but there were some younger people,
too. Students are drawn to these classes for the purpose of
learning, and there are no grades. I found these classes to be very
enjoyable, and the students always did extra work to keep the
discussions lively. If I could make a living teaching this type of
class, I would enjoy it.
The difference
between the students in a non-credit class and a public school
setting is that the non-credit classes are completely voluntary, and
the students are paying to attend. They therefore are made up of
students who are intrinsically motivated. Since middle school and
high school are compulsory, you have to develop the class to account
for both types of students.
I should also say
that I know of students who start school with a great deal of
internal motivation, but who struggle in one or two areas makes it hard
for them to get exemplary grades, which causes their love of learning
to deteriorate. Students like this can often start to feel like they
are not valued because they repeatedly get sub-optimal grades, and it
is hard to engage intellectually with a community that you feel does
not value you. Evaluating students on their “sense of wonder”
and “depth of inquiry” is designed to combat this deterioration,
but it is hard to prevent in all cases. It would be nice if we could
give grades only to those students who are not intrinsically
motivated, but that is not possible.
There are also
students who come to school brimming with curiosity who DO do well in
school, but who attach their ego so strongly to the notion of “being
an A student” that they replace their love of learning with a
desire to do better than other students in the class. I hope that
they get their curiosity back when they are older and are not
constantly being evaluated.
I think the school
you are referring to is Summerhill, which is an English school that
has been around for almost 100 years. Classes there are optional,
but tend to be well attended. There have been schools in many
countries, including the U.S., that are based on the program. The
school has supporters and detractors, but there is no denying that
there have been numerous successful graduates. The reason the school
is not necessarily a good laboratory for determining the best
education for everybody is that it is a very expensive boarding
school, and the students who are there tend to come from families
that value learning enough to select a school like that. In other
words, it is a selected community that does not represent the variety
of students that wind up in a public school (or public charter
school).
No comments:
Post a Comment